Why should any individual be governed by a "contract" that he never signed, and that the other party can unilaterally revise at its pleasure?
Will Grigg's essay at Lewrockwell.com today.
A place where we can develop the State of Jefferson in both theory and practice.
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Another voice.
The mythical SoJ takes on a real dimension, when we believe that we can, because we can. Enjoy the read.
Friday, June 29, 2012
America First Party
America First Party
1630 A 30th Street #111
Boulder, Colorado 80301
http://www.AmericaFirstParty.org
Friday, June 29, 2012
Supreme Court Decision: We Warned Against Roberts in 2005
Boulder, CO - The America First Party is not surprised by Justice John
Roberts' decision in the Obamacare lawsuits. After all, the Party warned
Americans about how dangerous Roberts was way back in 2005 when President
Bush nominated him for the position. With this latest disastrous betrayal of
the Constitution by Justice Roberts, the Bush II Presidency has once again
shown itself to be the gift that just keeps on giving.
Roberts had a track record of trampling on property rights, the rights of
innocent and helpless babies, and basic principles of fairness and justice
before he ascended to the High Court. In two press releases, the AFP called
the public's attention in 2005 to his penchant for stealing private property
by government force, countenancing abortion which takes an innocent life,
confiscating private funds to pay for unconstitutional government programs,
and ripping off torture victims -- including American war veterans -- of
their monetary awards for damages against the government of Iraq.
Former National Chairman Dan Charles said at the time: "President Bush had
promised the American people that he would nominate a constitutionalist
Supreme Court Justice in the mold of Justices Scalia or Thomas. Many
conservatives held their noses and voted for the President only because they
believed that promise. When he nominated Judge Roberts to replace retiring
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, President Bush broke that promise."
Now in this, one of the most devastating strikes against Constitutional
liberties in the last half century, Roberts provides the crucial vote to
uphold the so-called "health care mandate" under the taxing powers of the
Federal Government. The notion, that a penalty is really just a tax, is
ludicrous on its face, but now opens a pandora's box of regulations and
prohibitions and mandates masquerading as new "taxes."
National Secretary John Pittman Hey stated: "There is no limit, under
Roberts' reasoning, to the vexatious rules and onerous mandates that the
Federal Government can squeeze past the Constitution. Any regulation, no
matter how far afield from proper constitutional governance, no matter how
great an insult to the sharp limits on federal power enshrined in the
Constitution, will now be fair game."
Mr. Hey concluded: "Justice Roberts' violation of his oath to uphold the
Constitution is proof once again that Republicans cannot be counted on to
nominate qualified, decent, Constitutionalists to the High Court. This
betrayal tears away the last excuse that Republican hacks have always used
to coerce patriots into pulling the lever for the Republican nominee. The
bitter lesson learned is this: keep voting for Republicans, and expect to
continue to have your rights stripped away by their judges."
Contact:
Jonathan Hill, National Chairman 1-866-SOS-USA1, ext 4
John Pittman Hey, National Secretary, secretary@americafirstparty.org
_______________________________________________
Informer mailing list
Informer@americafirstparty.org
http://americafirstparty.org/mailman/listinfo/informer_americafirstparty.org
1630 A 30th Street #111
Boulder, Colorado 80301
http://www.AmericaFirstParty.org
Friday, June 29, 2012
Supreme Court Decision: We Warned Against Roberts in 2005
Boulder, CO - The America First Party is not surprised by Justice John
Roberts' decision in the Obamacare lawsuits. After all, the Party warned
Americans about how dangerous Roberts was way back in 2005 when President
Bush nominated him for the position. With this latest disastrous betrayal of
the Constitution by Justice Roberts, the Bush II Presidency has once again
shown itself to be the gift that just keeps on giving.
Roberts had a track record of trampling on property rights, the rights of
innocent and helpless babies, and basic principles of fairness and justice
before he ascended to the High Court. In two press releases, the AFP called
the public's attention in 2005 to his penchant for stealing private property
by government force, countenancing abortion which takes an innocent life,
confiscating private funds to pay for unconstitutional government programs,
and ripping off torture victims -- including American war veterans -- of
their monetary awards for damages against the government of Iraq.
Former National Chairman Dan Charles said at the time: "President Bush had
promised the American people that he would nominate a constitutionalist
Supreme Court Justice in the mold of Justices Scalia or Thomas. Many
conservatives held their noses and voted for the President only because they
believed that promise. When he nominated Judge Roberts to replace retiring
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, President Bush broke that promise."
Now in this, one of the most devastating strikes against Constitutional
liberties in the last half century, Roberts provides the crucial vote to
uphold the so-called "health care mandate" under the taxing powers of the
Federal Government. The notion, that a penalty is really just a tax, is
ludicrous on its face, but now opens a pandora's box of regulations and
prohibitions and mandates masquerading as new "taxes."
National Secretary John Pittman Hey stated: "There is no limit, under
Roberts' reasoning, to the vexatious rules and onerous mandates that the
Federal Government can squeeze past the Constitution. Any regulation, no
matter how far afield from proper constitutional governance, no matter how
great an insult to the sharp limits on federal power enshrined in the
Constitution, will now be fair game."
Mr. Hey concluded: "Justice Roberts' violation of his oath to uphold the
Constitution is proof once again that Republicans cannot be counted on to
nominate qualified, decent, Constitutionalists to the High Court. This
betrayal tears away the last excuse that Republican hacks have always used
to coerce patriots into pulling the lever for the Republican nominee. The
bitter lesson learned is this: keep voting for Republicans, and expect to
continue to have your rights stripped away by their judges."
Contact:
Jonathan Hill, National Chairman 1-866-SOS-USA1, ext 4
John Pittman Hey, National Secretary, secretary@americafirstparty.org
_______________________________________________
Informer mailing list
Informer@americafirstparty.org
http://americafirstparty.org/mailman/listinfo/informer_americafirstparty.org
Friday, June 15, 2012
Monday, April 2, 2012
They can only do this if we allow it
If you live here in Jefferson, you understand the problems with local grubbermint. Here is an update on Jackson County, Oregon. The only way to unrecognize this behavior is to withdraw consent - Jefferson should recognizen independent sovereignty.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Feral Pigs
Only if you redefine the word feral. This video tells us that there may not be a resolution with-in the system, but the folks in the film certainly believe that the law will protect them. Why?
Monday, March 26, 2012
KulturCritic's 1st Final Battle
When you give up on the existing culture as a source of future anything, you are left picking up the pieces and reconfiguring them into a new workable form. The latest federal executive order has reenforced my personal opinion that the State of Jefferson should be the Independent Sovereignty of Jefferson. We need to come to common agreement on new ground rules, but we have been through these discussions before on a political basis.
On a practical basis - the game is now the 1% vs. everybody else. Tea Party and Occupy! are just part of the tactics - the general strategy being ... being ... Hey guys - what is the common strategy? Here is a link to a much more detailed rationale for the new rules of the game.
On a practical basis - the game is now the 1% vs. everybody else. Tea Party and Occupy! are just part of the tactics - the general strategy being ... being ... Hey guys - what is the common strategy? Here is a link to a much more detailed rationale for the new rules of the game.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)